One platform, multiple monitoring types, billing that holds up.

Reimbursement, real

Medicare and a growing set of commercial insurers already pay for this

Remote monitoring reimbursement is an existing, government-funded program, not a new insurance product to convince anyone of. Practices bill under their own provider number and keep the reimbursement; Pulse is the software that lets them deliver the service and prove it happened.

One record

Physical, behavioral, and adherence, together

Blood pressure, glucose, and weight readings; behavioral health check-ins; medication adherence tracking: one patient record, one platform, rather than switching software as a practice adds monitoring services.

Billing documentation

Reporting that proves the monitoring happened

The most common complaint across competing platforms: broken or unusable reporting that leaves practices unable to prove they did the work required to get paid. This is the specific gap Pulse is built to close.

AI, measured

AI that reduces alarm noise, not one that diagnoses

A deliberately conservative amount of AI: reducing false alarms so clinical staff aren't drowning in noise, nothing that plays doctor. This is a liability-sensitive space, and Pulse is built to be trusted over flashy.

Practices already treating the conditions insurers recognize.

01

Primary care and cardiology practices with diabetic, hypertensive, or heart-failure patients: the clearest, least-disputed reimbursement path today, and the initial go-to-market focus.

02

A real, live product with pilot and paying practice customers. This is regulated, revenue-generating infrastructure in production, not a demo.

Continuia

Built by Continuia. Ask Maya about your practice's fit.

Pulse is a Continuia product, not a continuous.engineering consulting deliverable. Ask Maya which conditions and payers your practice is likely to qualify under, or open the app directly.

← Back to Solutions